
freeeploymentadvice.co.uk
Workplace Stress: THE LEGAL ESSENTIALS -
The summaries of cases on these pages illustrate developments in the Law of Workplace Stress 1999 to 2007.

Foreseeability: Working Conditions
Foreseeability: Reasonable Steps
Foreseeability: Evidence: Notice of Psychiatric Injury
Foreseeability: Contributory Negligence
Foreseeability: Excessive Workload
Foreseeability: Arrangements for Return to Work
Victim classification: Employee Witnessing Colleague’s Death
Victim classification: Post-
Constructive dismissal: Implied Term to take Reasonable Care for Health and Safety of Employees
Constructive Dismissal: Medical Evidence
Unfair Dismissal: Cause of Illness
Unfair Dismissal: Employment Tribunal: Compensation for Personal Injury
Unfair dismissal: Common Law Remedy
Disability Discrimination: Anxiety Disorder: Medical Evidence
Disability Discrimination: Disability: Medical Diagnosis
Disability Discrimination: Disability: Evidence of Mental Impairment
Damages: Causation: Exacerbation of Pre-
Damages: Quantum: Bullying at Work
Post-
Damages: Quantum: Anxiety Resulting from Minor Physical Injury
Post-
Service Personnel: Safe System of Work
Employment Tribunal Procedure: Postponement of Hearing: Medical Evidence
Foreseeability: Race Discrimination
Breach of Contract: Unfair Dismissal
Knowledge of Employer: Special Educational Needs School Teacher
Foreseeability: Stress Reduction Policy
Vicarious Liability: Breach of Statutory Duty: Harassment
Psychiatric Injury: Harassment: Foreseeability
Stress: Duty of Care Owed: Foreseeability
Stress: Duty of Care Owed: Workload
Stress: Foreseeability: Vicarious Liability
Psychiatric Injury: Foreseeability: Duty of Care
Post-
Post-
Stress:duty of Care Owed: Workload
Psychiatric Injury: Foreseeability: Duty of Care
Post-
Disability Discrimination Update
April 2008
Home About Me Qualifications Contact
Case Examples -
Sex Discrimination Disability Discrimination Workplace Stress Harassment & Bullying Employment Tribunals
Publications -

Criminal liability
West Dorset Hospitals NHS Trust: first criminal prosecution relating to workplace stress.
The HSE has issued an enforcement notice relating to workplace stress. This is the
first time that work-
The HSE has instructed the West Dorset Hospitals NHS Trust to assess stress levels among its 1,100 staff and to introduce a programme to reduce stress. If this is not done by December 15, the Trust may face criminal proceedings and the possibility of an unlimited fine.
The notice was issued after a written complaint by a former employee. This resulted in an HSE investigation which concluded that working practices at the Dorset County Hospital amounted to a health risk.
In legal terms, the importance of this development is that it marks a highly significant departure from current practice. Until now, workplace stress has never been within the remit of the criminal law. Illness resulting from stress caused by workplace conditions has been the subject of an increasing number of civil proceedings. Such proceedings have as their object an award of compensation. They are normally settled before coming to court, and are governed by the rules of civil procedure. Civil proceedings are brought between private individuals or organisations.
The advent of criminal proceedings may mean that employers who fail to meet required
standards in respect of workplace stress will face criminal proceedings in the magistrates’
court or the Crown Court. Such proceedings, if resulting in a guilty verdict, will
lead to fines imposed as a punishment. Criminal proceedings are brought on behalf
of the state against an alleged wrongdoer. Even if employers charged with stress-
The Confederation of British Industry is reported to have commented that plans to make employers monitor stress levels are “incredibly onerous”. If the HSE tried to issue an enforcement notice, companies should consider defending themselves through the courts.
The NHS has stated that it will monitor stress levels of all employees from next year. All employees will be asked about their working environment, with questions involving work pressures, ability to meet the demands of work, and access to counselling services.
Note:
This matter is now reported to have been settled.