photo of the scales of justice
Workplace Stress Advice
Home.About Me.Case Examples.Publications.Contact.Recruitment.FAQ's.
Employment Law - Working For You - header
Free Employment Advice
Employment Law - Working For You...
Photo of the scales of justice

freeeploymentadvice.co.uk

Pointer to this page

Case Examples

 

Redundancy

 

Unfair Dismissal

 

Constructive Dismissal

 

Unpaid wages

 

Race discrimination

 

Sex discrimination

 

Disability discrimination

 

Harassment and Bullying

 

Workplace stress

 

Employment tribunals

 

Workplace Stress:

The Legal Essentials

April 2008

Health & Safety

Case Law update

April 2008

Disability Discrimination Update

April 2008

Home  About Me  Qualifications  Contact

Case Examples  -  Redundancy  Unfair dismissal  Constructive Dismissal  Unpaid Wages  Race Discrimination

Sex Discrimination  Disability Discrimination  Workplace Stress  Harassment & Bullying  Employment Tribunals

Publications  -  Health & Safety Law  Disability Law  Discrimination Law  Employment Tribunals  Croner’s  History of Law  Publishing   Recruitment  FAQ’s

Tutti Frutti Web Design logo

Disability Discrimination Update - April 2008

Disability Discrimination:

 

Disability discrimination law, based on the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, has developed into a difficult and complex area of law.  This case illustrates the current approach of tribunals.

 

P was employed as an area sales manager.  When her workload was increased, she became ill.  She suffered from depression and started to drink heavily.  It was not clear whether her depression had caused her drinking, or whether alcohol addiction had resulted in depression.  P was dismissed after being off work for a year.  She complained of disability discrimination.

 

The employment tribunal dismissed her claim on the basis that addiction to alcohol, nicotine or any other substance is not to be regarded as an “impairment” which might give rise to disability discrimination.

P appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT).  the EAT allowed the appeal because the employment tribunal had failed to consider whether P had a “disability”.  The way in which a disability is caused is not relevant.