photo of the scales of justice
Workplace Stress Advice
Home.About Me.Case Examples.Publications.Contact.Recruitment.FAQ's.
Employment Law - Working For You - header
Free Employment Advice
Employment Law - Working For You...
Photo of the scales of justice

freeeploymentadvice.co.uk

Pointer to this page

Case Examples

 

Redundancy

 

Unfair Dismissal

 

Constructive Dismissal

 

Unpaid wages

 

Race discrimination

 

Sex discrimination

 

Disability discrimination

 

Harassment and Bullying

 

Workplace stress

 

Employment tribunals

 

Workplace Stress:

The Legal Essentials

April 2008

Health & Safety

Case Law update

April 2008

Disability Discrimination Update

April 2008

Home  About Me  Qualifications  Contact

Case Examples  -  Redundancy  Unfair dismissal  Constructive Dismissal  Unpaid Wages  Race Discrimination

Sex Discrimination  Disability Discrimination  Workplace Stress  Harassment & Bullying  Employment Tribunals

Publications  -  Health & Safety Law  Disability Law  Discrimination Law  Employment Tribunals  Croner’s  History of Law  Publishing   Recruitment  FAQ’s

Tutti Frutti Web Design logo
Pointer to this page

Employment Tribunals:

(formerly Industrial tribunals)

 

Most employment disputes which cannot be settled are dealt with by the employment tribunal.  These were set up with the aim of providing a quick, cheap and informal means of settling employment disputes.  It is important to note that the law governing employment tribunals has now developed to a state of extreme complexity.  It is now very difficult for employees to represent themselves in employment tribunal proceedings and there is statistical evidence that unrepresented applicants have a lower chance of success than those who hire lawyers.

 

K, a police sergeant, made a discrimination complaint to an employment tribunal.  At the time of the hearing K was breast feeding her four-week old child.   The tribunal hearing was interrupted a number of times for the child to be fed.  K asked if the child could be present in the tribunal room.

 

The chairperson stated that she would not have babies, dogs or children in the tribunal and that K’s lawyer could arrange for one of her minions to look after it.  K applied for the tribunal to disqualify itself on the grounds of bias.  The tribunal refused and K appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT).  The EAT stated that the moderate and temperate use of language was of vital importance but the behaviour of the tribunal had not amounted to bias.