photo of the scales of justice
Workplace Stress Advice
Home.About Me.Case Examples.Publications.Contact.Recruitment.FAQ's.
Employment Law - Working For You - header
Free Employment Advice
Employment Law - Working For You...
Photo of the scales of justice

freeeploymentadvice.co.uk

Pointer to this page

Case Examples

 

Redundancy

 

Unfair Dismissal

 

Constructive Dismissal

 

Unpaid wages

 

Race discrimination

 

Sex discrimination

 

Disability discrimination

 

Harassment and Bullying

 

Workplace stress

 

Employment tribunals

 

Workplace Stress:

The Legal Essentials

April 2008

Health & Safety

Case Law update

April 2008

Disability Discrimination Update

April 2008

Home  About Me  Qualifications  Contact

Case Examples  -  Redundancy  Unfair dismissal  Constructive Dismissal  Unpaid Wages  Race Discrimination

Sex Discrimination  Disability Discrimination  Workplace Stress  Harassment & Bullying  Employment Tribunals

Publications  -  Health & Safety Law  Disability Law  Discrimination Law  Employment Tribunals  Croner’s  History of Law  Publishing   Recruitment  FAQ’s

Tutti Frutti Web Design logo

Unfair Dismissal:

 

Employees have a statutory right not to be unfairly dismissed.  Where dismissal is admitted by the employer, then the employer must generally show that the dismissal fell within one or more of the following categories:

 

•  Misconduct

•  Poor capability or qualifications

•  Redundancy

•  Unlawfulness

•  Some other substantial reason

 

The key concept in unfair dismissal cases is “reasonableness”.  the employment tribunal has a very wide discretion in deciding this matter.

 

Y was employed by a major supermarket chain as a baker.  He was dismissed for allegedly stealing a box of razor blades which were found in his locker.  Y claimed that they had been put there by someone else.  He complained of unfair dismissal.  The employment tribunal ruled that the dismissal had been unfair because the employer’s investigation of the alleged theft had been flawed and inadequate.  The employers appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal which dismissed the appeal and ruled that it could not interfere with the employment tribunal’s decision on the facts of the case.

 

The employers then appealed to the Court of Appeal.  That Court allowed the appeal and made the following points:

 

•  The employment tribunal had substituted its own opinion of what was a reasonable and adequate investigation instead of applying the objective standard of the reasonable employer as to what was a reasonable investigation.

•  If the correct approach had been taken, the only conclusion which a reasonable tribunal could have reached was that the employer’s investigation was reasonable in all the circumstances, and that the dismissal was reasonable.